FILE PHOTO: A customer browses products inside a Monoprix supermarket operated by Casino Group, following the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in Paris, France August 7, 2020. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo
October 5, 2020
By Foo Yun Chee
LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) – French supermarket groups Casino <CASP.PA> and Intermarche on Monday won a partial victory in their fight against an EU antitrust raid and demand for information into a buying alliance after Europe’s second-top court said regulators failed to prove wrongdoing.
The supermarkets’ challenge against the European Commission underlined the recent willingness of companies to fight what they say are excessive demands and regulatory overreach by the EU competition enforcer.
The Commission in February 2017 ordered the companies and their subsidiaries to submit to an inspection.
The EU competition enforcer last year subsequently opened an investigation into the supermarkets’ purchasing alliance set up in France in 2014, saying that this could have been used to illegally coordinate their actions.
The supermarkets then took their case to the Luxembourg-based court, disputing the legality of the seizure and copying of data relating to the private lives of their employees and managers and the refusal to return those data.
The General Court agreed with some of their arguments and annulled part of the Commission’s inspection decisions. However, it also upheld the EU system for conducting antitrust raids.
“The Commission has failed to show that it had sufficiently strong evidence to suspect exchanges of information concerning the future commercial strategies of the undertakings,” judges said.
The tie-up was dissolved in 2018 when Casino and France’s Auchan agreed to a global buying deal.
Buying tie-ups have become more popular in recent years as a tactic to counter online retail giant Amazon <AMZN.O> and rivals offering price discounts.
The cases are T-249/17 Casino, Guichard-Perrachon and AMC v Commission; T-254/17 Intermarché Casino Achats v Commission; and T-255/17 Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises v Commission.
(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; Editing by Kirsten Donovan)